Key Similarities between OJ and MJ
Why were neither of these guys convicted? Was it that they are black? Celebrities? Innocent? In California?
No, I think the key is that they are not a threat to anyone else. Neither one can harm anyone else who is not dumb enough to get in his bed. If you don't date them, they are not dangerous, and I think that is enough to aid "reasonable doubt" in the minds of a jury. If they are wrong, no one else will get hurt, unless they are dumb enough to go to bed with an accused murderer/pederast...recognizing MJ was a potential pederast and kids can't always protect themselves, but still, any kid who gets that close to him has plenty of parental involvment watching out for his interests. But if they convict an innocent man, the jury will feel guilty forever.
And I think that is reasonable. At this point, anyone who gets in bed with either pretty much deserve what they get, don't you think? Perhaps it is a rational justice system.
posted by Jrudkis @ 8:57 PM
2 comments
2 Comments:
In OJ's case, you can be killed for getting in bed with someone who got in bed with him. You don't have to get in bed with OJ.
Good point, but still a similar threat level. So long as you avoid anything to do with his bed, you are probably safe.
Post a Comment
<< Home